HinesDawg wrote:There's no way to argue RAI correctly, currently. You can only read what is there. In 7th edition, there was a body of work and prior trends to follow to know kinda what GW was doing. We no longer have that. This is the reinvention of the wheel.
BrandonPHX wrote:RAI is an emotional and illogical way to decide how a rule works. No one has any basis, on which to say, "I know how GW intended this rule to be played", unless you're one of the game designers or John Edward.
HinesDawg wrote:I wouldn't go this far as there are times (occasionally) where GW has left us clues/hints on how things are designed to be played.. there just aren't any of those for 8th yet as all the Army Books are still 7th ed and there's nothing out there but the BRB/LRB and the FAQs
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest